Not signed in (Sign In)

Categories

Vanilla 1.1.4 is a product of Lussumo. More Information: Documentation, Community Support.

Help keep Vanilla free:
Welcome Guest!
Want to take part in these discussions? If you have an account, sign in now.
If you don't have an account, apply for one now.
    •  
      CommentAuthorjesusphreak
    • CommentTimeNov 11th 2005 edited
     # 1
    I've been thinking about this recently, despite my thread about not using Firefox any longer. :)

    Anyway, with AJAX becoming more and more popular and so very useful, I was wondering why Firefox is not used for desktop applications?

    Basically, the idea is this. You strip from Firefox everything except for the basic browser functions....basically it is nothing but a screen that can render HTML/JavaScript, etc. You could perhaps leave the extensions option as a way to add to your app.

    Anyway, you code your program in PHP/Ruby on Rails, whatever you'd like, make the frontend AJAXY and you package it up with this stripped down Firefox browser.

    Walla...instant GUI that is extremely editable and it makes it very easy for any web developer to make a desktop application that works across multiple OS's.

    Why isn't this happening or is it already happening and I don't know about it?
  1.  # 2
    Interesting, but not the best idea i've heard.

    FYI, you can make flash movies executable apps.
    •  
      CommentAuthor3stripe
    • CommentTimeNov 11th 2005
     # 3
    hmmm interesting.... i'm sure google must have something in the pipeline
    • CommentAuthorSirNot
    • CommentTimeNov 11th 2005
     # 4
    A lot of applications of smaller 'businesses' do use such a technique. The HTMLBlock executable, for instance, is merely an IE frontend which automatically redirects you to their site. Often, though, it's easier, safer and more efficient to simply create an executable, especially because js is very limited in regard to interacting with the operating system.

    However, if one does insert an IE object into their application, they can do so with minimal difficulty, as the control is located within a loadable dynamic library in Windows. With Firefox, you'd have to completely include the browser with your application, in addition to hacking the source to do what you want with it, thus hugely bloating your code for something which could probably be many times smaller when created with an application programming language. For the amount of trouble you'd go through to get Firefox in such a state, it'd probably be simpler to just create an application.
  2.  # 5
    Well, that's the thing. Of course if everyone had to hack Firefox everytime they were making an app, it would be a pain...it would be cool if a group could modify Firefox and more or less make and SDK so that a lot of the low-level stuff was handled for devs.

    Also, when dealing with Windows libraries, those are things that don't go cross-platform.
    •  
      CommentAuthor3stripe
    • CommentTimeNov 11th 2005 edited
     # 6
    No one mention the "[F](http://www.flock.com/)" word!
  3.  # 7
    Man that website is ugly.
  4.  # 8
    You gotta give it to them, they took simple to a new edge.
  5.  # 9
    blah. You want all the hype in the world rolled up into one application, you have Flock.
    •  
      CommentAuthor3stripe
    • CommentTimeNov 11th 2005
     # 10
    anyhows going back on topic...
  6.  # 11
    lol, that would be a good idea.
    •  
      CommentAuthor3stripe
    • CommentTimeNov 11th 2005 edited
     # 12
    man i just got told off AGAIN on wordpress support forums for posting a new post about something I'd commented on in another thread!!!!

    >"Starting a new thread because you didn't get the answer you wanted in another thread with the same request is poor etiquette."

    at least here it's a bit more relaxed :-)
    •  
      CommentAuthor3stripe
    • CommentTimeNov 11th 2005
     # 13
    a decent online photo editing tool would be a nice app... i've seen one but it nevers seems to work properly
  7.  # 14
    Yeah, I've always thought that as well 3stripe. Even a program that would simply resize/crop photos and export them in different formats would be good enough for me. Anyone know of such a program?
    •  
      CommentAuthor3stripe
    • CommentTimeNov 11th 2005
     # 15
    searching through me favourites... hang on...
    •  
      CommentAuthorlech
    • CommentTimeNov 11th 2005
     # 16
    Heh, if you got an answer the first time around, you wouldn't have to start up a new thread. Over here, that's fine and dandy as long as someone else comes along to point the person to the right thread and helps to clarify.

    As for the topic at hand, I could see it possible, but what would it add to the already relevant desktop? It sounds just like active desktop in windows with FF instead of IE (which for the most part would be better) but I don't know anyone who uses active desktop and frankly I find it the most annoying feature on the whole. If windows was made more open to allowing these kinds of features, I'm sure I'd be more open to trying it, but it can't be easily accomplished without some serious hacking at the cost of system instability. :/
    •  
      CommentAuthor3stripe
    • CommentTimeNov 11th 2005
     # 17
    yeah that's what i thought.... i get more replies telling me about my poor etiquette than i do answering my questions... i think that's bloody poor etiquette!!!!!
    •  
      CommentAuthor3stripe
    • CommentTimeNov 11th 2005 edited
     # 18
    "Photos made easy" - http://www.pxn8.com/

    Doesn't seem to be loading though so not sure if this is the app i had in mind...

    Actually, nope, it's there, and with Flickr integration, interesting...
    •  
      CommentAuthorjesusphreak
    • CommentTimeNov 11th 2005 edited
     # 19
    lech, the point would be for it to make it easier for beginning devs to make apps using nothing but CSS, HTML, and their favorite scripting language.
  8.  # 20
    ahh, hold on, up till now i dont think i'd quite grasped what the intention behind this app was. I was figuring more as using stripped down ff as a container for a 'program' which was written in a web language.
  9.  # 21
    I think that is the same thing I said in the post above you.
    •  
      CommentAuthor3stripe
    • CommentTimeNov 11th 2005
     # 22
    i would much rather see a universal browser interface
  10.  # 23
    Now I'm just confused. 3stripe, is what I'm suggesting different than what you have in mind?
    •  
      CommentAuthor3stripe
    • CommentTimeNov 11th 2005 edited
     # 24
    (don't know if it's just my laptop, but pxn8 is ^&*%ing slow!)
    •  
      CommentAuthor3stripe
    • CommentTimeNov 11th 2005 edited
     # 25
    jesuspreak, nah i mean a way to make all browsers render html in exactly the same way using some kind of common engine, is that possible or just stupid?
  11.  # 26
    yeah, 3stripe, the site is slow for me, too...

    Anyway, your idea probably IS stupid to MS and Mozilla because they lose their leverage on the other browsers. Sad, I know.
    •  
      CommentAuthor3stripe
    • CommentTimeNov 11th 2005
     # 27
    hmmm but is it possible.... only mention cos i remember seeing an article on how it's going to get even harder to code websites what with all the crazy mobile browsers, tablet style browsers etc now kicking about....
  12.  # 28
    I have no idea where this thread is going in relation to the topic anymore. Does that matter?
    •  
      CommentAuthor3stripe
    • CommentTimeNov 12th 2005
     # 29
    Well it seems to me that current browser based apps like http://www.pxn8.com/ are pretty slow! And you're never going to build a Photoshop beater.... so what kind of app would be worth having on this kind of basis, something more like an open-office kind of thing?
  13.  # 30
    The reason most browser based apps are slow is because they are based on a server online. My approach wouldn't be like that - the program is on your own PC.
    •  
      CommentAuthor3stripe
    • CommentTimeNov 12th 2005
     # 31
    Ah ok that makes much more sense
    •  
      CommentAuthorlech
    • CommentTimeNov 12th 2005
     # 32
    Well, there's also some of those folks who still code for IE just for the fun fact that they can apply all kinds of C++/VB hackery to it. But yeah, I derailed it a bit when I overlooked the "web friendly scripting" criteria, so snuff my last reply.
Add your comments
    Username Password
  • Format comments as