Not signed in (Sign In)

Categories

Vanilla 1.1.4 is a product of Lussumo. More Information: Documentation, Community Support.

Help keep Vanilla free:
Welcome Guest!
Want to take part in these discussions? If you have an account, sign in now.
If you don't have an account, apply for one now.
    •  
      CommentAuthorBen
    • CommentTimeFeb 19th 2006 edited
     # 1
    Mr Heilemann says:
    We've now been using these Vanilla forums for a good while now, and the traffic has skyrocketed way beyond anything I could've hoped or imagined for.

    I've noticed however, that I am continually lost in the massive activity on here. It's hard to really keep track of what's new and what belongs where. It is of course not helped by the fact that the current beta I've installed is quite buggy; but I'll take full responsibility for that,

    Anyway, I looked a bit at the other solutions out there, specifically what solutions that are being used on the forums I otherwise frequent. And as near as I can tell, vBulletin is the best solution out there at the moment. It's highly customizable, well supported and it works very very well. There's only one problem, it costs money.

    http://binarybonsai.com/forums/comments.php?DiscussionID=628


    It's a shame as this was an enormous forum, and a huge advert for Vanilla and Lussumo.
    •  
      CommentAuthormarcaprice
    • CommentTimeFeb 19th 2006 edited
     # 2
    It is a pity, that was where I first came accross Vanilla. And for such a big forum to move away can't be good advert either...
    •  
      CommentAuthorgiginger
    • CommentTimeFeb 19th 2006
     # 3
    It seems a bit quick to change their mind to be honest.

    I'm not sure if VBulletin is the way forward either. Never had a good experience with that software.

    I think they'd be better to wait for the fill release. They are using Beta and version1 release is basically ready.
    •  
      CommentAuthormarcaprice
    • CommentTimeFeb 19th 2006
     # 4
    Right, it wasn't that long ago when they were using the Flickr forum. Well, I'm please I got pointed here anyway. Looking forward to v1 :)
    • CommentAuthorSirNot
    • CommentTimeFeb 19th 2006 edited
     # 5
    It is too bad, but I can nevertheless see his point about keeping up with posts on an extremely busy forum. As nice as Vanilla is, it's just not something I could see behind a site like codeguru, gaia online, or some other huge community.
    •  
      CommentAuthorMark
    • CommentTimeFeb 19th 2006 edited
     # 6
    On a big forum like that, it just makes sense to have something with a more category-driven flow. I'm just surprised he didn't choose to go with something like punbb, which is a great little forum.
    •  
      CommentAuthorCrypt
    • CommentTimeFeb 19th 2006
     # 7
    punbb is allright its lacking some key features. phpbb is probably his best bet.
  1.  # 8
    I don't understand why Vanilla cannot work.

    Is it due to performance reasons? The issue about keeping up with posts is a bit silly, imo. If its too much to take in at once, just look at a different category individually.

    And if its just too many threads period - you'll have that problem with any forum system - vBulletin and such will only make it worse because you are forced to check each seperate category instead of getting a single overview at once.

    I don't know, I just don't really see the problem.You look at his forum and everything from the last 24 hours (and more) is still on the frontpage.
    • CommentAuthorSirNot
    • CommentTimeFeb 19th 2006
     # 9
    I think the point is that Vanilla is much less categorically driven, and as such is probably much better suited to small and medium traffic sites (many times it's hard enough to keep track of posts in each category on some sites, let alone globally). While it is perfectly possible to turn it into a forum based largely on categories, it often makes more sense to simply use a forum designed for such a purpose. It'd be like modding punBB to look like Vanilla.
    •  
      CommentAuthorCrypt
    • CommentTimeFeb 19th 2006
     # 10
    hey! well i plan on using vanilla for a highly populated site or i might modify phpbb a ton
    •  
      CommentAuthorlech
    • CommentTimeFeb 19th 2006
     # 11
    I think it has more to do with Categories having Subs. So you can make a Category named "Primary Colors" then dump a seperate category devoted soley to "red" "blue" and then "green". and really split things off as you need to. WIth other forums, so far that's pretty easy to do and comes as a core feature along with the stupid little folder icons next to the category title near the topic title.

    That and users want their signatures, stupid rediculously-large avatars, and segregated private messaging with the ability to upload. Along with the post-whore stats, warnings and karma crap and other useless features (to me at least). Given, Vanilla at the moment is none of these (yet!) but it needs some time to evolve. We'll likely come up with some inventive extensions and plugins to get people high for a while. But Vanilla has only been in dev for like what? nearing 2 years, right? (excluding o8 mind you).

    I don't think they made a bad choice, really, if they want to give people something familiar, more power to them. At least they tried it, found things they liked, and uncovered a few bugs we may have missed. Lets just not all turn into Vanilla zealots and start shoving it down their throat, they'll come around when they feel like it :)
    •  
      CommentAuthorCrypt
    • CommentTimeFeb 19th 2006
     # 12
    @lech: i would totally quote everything you said except there is no quote function >_< , but other than that I totally agree with you. Yes Vanilla is lacking some important features (quoting!) but signatures, and crazy avatars are just stupid. I like how Vanilla is so conceptual in forum software.

    ¡VIVA LA VANILLA! ...I hope that was done right
    •  
      CommentAuthorgiginger
    • CommentTimeFeb 19th 2006
     # 13
    I suppose it boils down to some people liking the plain forum style of Vanilla and others wanting every feature imagined.
    • CommentAuthorchris
    • CommentTimeFeb 19th 2006
     # 14
    once vanilla gets to v1, i am porting a 12k member vb install over...
    • CommentAuthorchris
    • CommentTimeFeb 19th 2006
     # 15
    (to be fair, there are only ever around 250 users online at any given time)
    •  
      CommentAuthorMark
    • CommentTimeFeb 19th 2006
     # 16
    What lech said :)
    • CommentAuthordknighton
    • CommentTimeFeb 19th 2006
     # 17
    lech...totally agree with you. When I found Vanilla, it was a breath of fresh air as far as forums go. Systems like PHPBB and VBulletin are perfect cases of information overload. I run my system at 1024x768, and on most bloated boards, I have to scroll half way down the page to see any actual FORUMS. The top half is consumed with crap stats that mean nothing to anyone except an administrator or a moderator. The sigs that are allowed on most of those boards are ridiculous too, especially in threads that get a lot of traffic with multiple posts from the same users. Seeing their dancing unicorns and laser beams once is annoying enough...seeing it on every single follow-up post makes the thread virtually unusable.

    I know that sub-forums can have their place in a high-traffic environment, but all that other stuff is just crap for the most part.

    Vanilla is the perfect case for having a designer involved in the process. Systems like PHPBB are great examples of what happens when hard-core coders do design. Ick!
    •  
      CommentAuthorBergamot
    • CommentTimeFeb 19th 2006
     # 18
    I think it's silly to expect Vanilla to be the best forum for all sites, especially at it's current state of maturity.
    •  
      CommentAuthorBergamot
    • CommentTimeFeb 19th 2006
     # 19
    dknighton: you can say what you want about laser beams, but leave the unicorns out of this.
    • CommentAuthoraloicious
    • CommentTimeFeb 20th 2006
     # 20
    Could one not just turn on Categories on the front page if so desired?
    •  
      CommentAuthorBergamot
    • CommentTimeFeb 20th 2006
     # 21
    Yeah, but if you're going to do all the work to make Vanilla into a phpbb clone, you might as well just use phpbb and save yourself the effort.
    •  
      CommentAuthorCrypt
    • CommentTimeFeb 20th 2006
     # 22
    @ Bergamot: agreed. vanilla is the way it is for a reason
    •  
      CommentAuthorKosmo
    • CommentTimeFeb 20th 2006
     # 23
    If he is going with vBulletin he is just a dummie, after using Vanilla and punBB I know how bad the vBulletin and phpBB and such are, it's a crime how they are popular. It's like IE, people are so used to them that they rather use crappy software than something that is really pushing the envelope and thusly making innovation unable to happen, strange when Heilemann himself is a huge innovator.
    • CommentAuthoraloicious
    • CommentTimeFeb 20th 2006
     # 24
    Chill fellas, merely a suggestion. Don't shoot me.

    Considering the other option is migration I thought it may be worthwhile.
    • CommentAuthorchris
    • CommentTimeFeb 20th 2006
     # 25
    tbh, vb used to be one hell of a script. i think that vb3 brought the bloat though, which is one of the reasons for the move to vanilla (for me). so fresh :)
Add your comments
    Username Password
  • Format comments as