Not signed in (Sign In)

Categories

Vanilla 1.1.5 is a product of Lussumo. More Information: Documentation, Community Support.

Help keep Vanilla free:
Welcome Guest!
Want to take part in these discussions? If you have an account, sign in now.
If you don't have an account, apply for one now.
    • CommentAuthorcircuit
    • CommentTimeJun 18th 2008 edited
     # 201
    no idea why this bug doesn't seem to be there my forum. i am an admin, that's the only difference between my forum and the other examples above.
    • CommentAuthorcircuit
    • CommentTimeJun 18th 2008
     # 202
    a comment from a user on my forum: "Seems like a four-figure number higher than 1000 will do it". not sure if this is true.
    • CommentAuthorscherem
    • CommentTimeJun 22nd 2008 edited
     # 203
    I think I may have an answer to my problem-- our website guy wanted the LUM_User table renamed to just User. Is it possible that Private_Messages is looking for LUM_User and just letting access go ahead?

    EDIT: Nope that doesn't appear to solve it.
    • CommentAuthorscherem
    • CommentTimeJun 22nd 2008 edited
     # 204
    Another question-- Where in the DB does private messages restirct the users? I noticed that my LUM_*Whisper table's are empty, and so are the WhipserfromLast and WhispetoLastID in LUM_Discussion is null.

    EDIT: So my whispers was disabled, and I guess this is the problem. Does Vanilla enable whispers by default?

    EDIT 2: No dice. Whispers enabled, but still not seeing the whisper information enter the tables.
    • CommentAuthorAppleApps
    • CommentTimeJul 10th 2008
     # 205
    2. An indicator on the "Inbox" tab that tells you that you have a new message: *ex. Inbox (1)*
    ^
    ^
    ^

    Is there any update on that ?
    •  
      CommentAuthorJonny
    • CommentTimeJul 11th 2008
     # 206
    No update as of yet on that... I believe this extension is supposed to do that. But it doesn't.

    Definitely causing my members and I to catch some private messages late... :(
    • CommentAuthorAppleApps
    • CommentTimeJul 12th 2008
     # 207
    But I saw some adjustments here and there are some linkages ready and adjusted, but for the process ..

    ok , I'm added in the databases this table :
    CREATE TABLE `LUM_UserDiscussionHide` (
    `UserID` int(10) NOT NULL default '0',
    `DiscussionID` int(8) NOT NULL default '0',
    PRIMARY KEY (`UserID`,`DiscussionID`)
    );

    and i replace default.php file to http://dev.emericaskate.com/default.php.gz

    Now Appears in the Tap * inbox (0) " but does not change if there was a new message for you .!

    any helping?
    • CommentAuthorAppleApps
    • CommentTimeJul 16th 2008 edited
     # 208
    bump ^
    any one has been updated version here
    •  
      CommentAuthorJonny
    • CommentTimeJul 16th 2008
     # 209
    AppleApps, that link to the updated default.php file does not appear to be working...? Have another link for it? Or perhaps just the modified bits of code to the default.php file in order to make this happen?

    I'd love to make this work as intended, in the tab atop the forum.
    • CommentAuthorStahlblau
    • CommentTimeJul 24th 2008
     # 210
    Hi.! Are there any updates on the indicator problem?
    • CommentAuthor0169
    • CommentTimeAug 3rd 2008
     # 211
    Can I request someone upload jehul's release with delete function? All previous links are dead :(
    • CommentAuthorXK
    • CommentTimeSep 12th 2008
     # 212
    Hello,

    My users are getting confused because PM's show the first recipient in a PM exchange as the username in the first field. So if the PM's were sent to you originally, your inbox shows a list of PM's with only your username on the left hand column list, not the person you are exchanging it them with.

    Is there a way to get the field to show both parties' usernames?
    • CommentAuthorrikin
    • CommentTime7 days ago
     # 213
    hi,

    anyone has latest working version? all posted links in this discussion are dead.
    • CommentAuthorRaize
    • CommentTime7 days ago edited
     # 214
    Would this even work with the latest version of 1.1.5a?
    • CommentAuthorrikin
    • CommentTime6 days ago
     # 215
    For me, the version Private Message v1.1 is not working with latest vanilla.
    It stops working as soon as you remove all the roles from "Category" assign for private messages.
Add your comments
    Username Password
  • Format comments as