Not signed in (Sign In)

Categories

Vanilla 1.1.4 is a product of Lussumo. More Information: Documentation, Community Support.

Help keep Vanilla free:
Welcome Guest!
Want to take part in these discussions? If you have an account, sign in now.
If you don't have an account, apply for one now.
    •  
      CommentAuthorHamed
    • CommentTimeJan 6th 2008
     # 1
    idea for new whisper feature for vanilla
    maybe the next release of vanilla, we can have a whisper system that we can whisper between more than 2 ppl
    like whisper between only 3 people
    or 4 or the number of users you enter in the whisper box separated by a comma

    what do u think?
  1.  # 2
    Seconded! This is definitely needed. However, seeing as it is a feature, it will probably not be added until the next major release of Vanilla :(

    Vanilla 1.2?
    •  
      CommentAuthorHamed
    • CommentTimeJan 7th 2008
     # 3
    oh yeah
    you are prabably right

    but yeah i hope this comes
    it will be a really cool feature to have
    and awesome one
    •  
      CommentAuthorHamed
    • CommentTimeJan 17th 2008
     # 4
    does anyone else like this idea?
    • CommentAuthorfysicsluvr
    • CommentTimeJan 21st 2008
     # 5
    this is freaking awesome!
    • CommentAuthorfysicsluvr
    • CommentTimeJan 21st 2008
     # 6
    oooooh oooooh oooooooh

    and it could be a role based whisper too, like whisper to: admin, etc.
    •  
      CommentAuthorFyorl
    • CommentTimeJan 21st 2008
     # 7
    So would they work just like 'private' discussions with only a certain number of people/roles allowed to post? Or would this be available in normal discussions too but just so you send a whisper to more than one person.

    IMO, just private discussions would be easier to implement but the second one can be handled too. I'd offer to write an extension but I'm still working on a certain secret project.
    •  
      CommentAuthorHamed
    • CommentTimeJan 22nd 2008
     # 8
    yeah it would like just like normal whisper
    there should not be a difference, except in the discussion it now says for example
    whisper to Fyorl, fysicsluvr, sirlancelot, hamed

    and maybe the admin could edit the max number of people he can whisper to at one time

    and yeah fysicsluvr has a good idea too
    it could be role based
    yeah
    •  
      CommentAuthorFyorl
    • CommentTimeJan 23rd 2008
     # 9
    It's definitely possible...
    • CommentAuthortimfire
    • CommentTimeJan 23rd 2008
     # 10
    The idea has come up before, though nothing has come of it.

    Filtering such whispers would be easy. You could create a couple tables, like, DiscussionIsWhisper & CommentIsWhisper, each with two columns, UserID & DiscussionD/CommentID (respectively). You then add the tables to the discussion/comment query and filter out discussions/comments that are whispers (that have an entry) and don't have the User's ID.

    There's some question to whether you would want to augment the whisper system for saving & such, or whether you would want to bypass the whisper system and create a parallel system for saving. The whisper system is hard-wired in, so it creates some technical issues with augmenting it...

    My guess would be you could have the User enter all whisper-to usernames in the normal field, seperated by commas. Then, pre-save, you seperate/expode the username field, make the *IsWhisper entries, and then erase the username field. (This would save the discussion as a non-whisper, but since it would have a *IsWhisper entry, it would get filtered out of queries.) When loading a discussion/comment, you would then insert the the multiple whisper usernames as a single string/username... I think that all would work...
    •  
      CommentAuthorHamed
    • CommentTimeJan 24th 2008
     # 11
    oh yeah i just realized
    it should look different on the outside too
    you know how a whisper discussion normally says
    [private]
    well this one should say [multi-private]
    something like that so the other member(s) who read it know they are not the only one being talked too

    do you guys understand what i am saying?
    or am I being confusing?
    •  
      CommentAuthorFyorl
    • CommentTimeJan 24th 2008 edited
     # 12
    No, I understand. Although I think it would be better if it just used [Private:] and then followed with a list of users who could read it.
    •  
      CommentAuthorHamed
    • CommentTimeJan 24th 2008
     # 13
    yeah maybe i don't know
    but maybe
    i still don't know
    the idea just came to me that we should indicate that somehow

    also once you send a whisper discussion to 1 person you cannot edit it so you can have more than that person on there
    and if you have entered whisper to : hamed, Fyorl
    you cannot edit it to make it only whisper to: Hamed
    what do you think?
    •  
      CommentAuthorHamed
    • CommentTimeFeb 15th 2008
     # 14
    any one else like the idea?
    •  
      CommentAuthorgarvin
    • CommentTimeFeb 16th 2008
     # 15
    I'm not sure if this will add anything to the current conversation, but I'm going to try and relate what I'm doing and hopefully give you some ideas.

    I'm using one of my installs as a project management area for us to communicate with clients. We have set up a group of administrators who have the ability "All whispers visible," amongst other things, but that's the key to this. All of our discussions are started by us as whispers to the client. That way clients only see their whispers, and we only had to create a few categories (Designs, Maintenance, Technical Support) so that everything keeps organized vs. creating a category per client (100+ categories would have been difficult to maintain). So, with that type of setup and giving some users with the ability of "All whispers visible" you can whisper to a group. You would just need to set up a category specifically for that group.

    We have a client (user a) who basically is the middleman between his 3-4 customers (users b,c,d,e). So, we set up a category (such as "Client a's Area") and gave user a access only to that category and All whispers visible. Then we created a similar role for users b,c,d, and e so that they could only access that one category. We whispered one discussion to each b,c,d,e - basically, using the same setup as we do for all of our clients. Now, user a has the ability to manage a project, both by monitoring it and posting himself in those areas, even though they are whispers to other people.

    So - basically, yes - you're idea is a good one. However, it is possible to obtain what you are looking for without adding new pieces to the puzzle. Obviously, your set up is probably different so this might need to be tweaked a bit to fit better into how you do things. But, its an idea.
    • CommentAuthortimfire
    • CommentTimeFeb 16th 2008
     # 16
    I looked into this awhile ago. It is possible, of course, but it would require the extension programmer to bypass the entire whisper system and rewrite a new one. Because of the way the various whisper functions are hard-coded, it simply won't allow multiple-whispers (I forget exactly what was the issue, it was awhile ago). So unfortunately, you're talking more programming work. Potentially there might also be some issues with integrating both the old whisper system (you don't want to erase or expose old whispers) and the new system.
    •  
      CommentAuthorHamed
    • CommentTimeMar 26th 2008
     # 17
    oh i see
    yeah i guess that would be a big huge job
    maybe they could have this for the vanilla 2
Add your comments
    Username Password
  • Format comments as