Not signed in (Sign In)

Categories

Vanilla 1.1.4 is a product of Lussumo. More Information: Documentation, Community Support.

Help keep Vanilla free:
Welcome Guest!
Want to take part in these discussions? If you have an account, sign in now.
If you don't have an account, apply for one now.
    •  
      CommentAuthorKosmo
    • CommentTimeOct 3rd 2005
     # 1
    First there was the "Google buying dark fiber" and now providing a free WiFi for San Francisco. Google is fast becoming company with their hands on everything internet communications, how long will it take before they challenge mobilephone operators and bring their own phone that supports Google talk natively.

    Well, I sure hope they start to provide free toiletpaper with "ads by goooooogle".
    •  
      CommentAuthorNAG
    • CommentTimeOct 3rd 2005
     # 2
    not getting involved - eh lech! eh, eh! ;)
    •  
      CommentAuthorgiginger
    • CommentTimeOct 3rd 2005
     # 3
    It's a great way to power their ads program. If they're providing the access then they have wonderful views of peoples surfing patterns etc. Fantastic.
    •  
      CommentAuthorlech
    • CommentTimeOct 3rd 2005
     # 4
    Personally, I have seen no real harm of all the free stuff they're offering. And honestly, it's really up to the end user to use and abuse their free systems after all. If they're offering free wifi all over the place for whatever use, I'm not at all bothered by that, in fact I personally invite our new overlords.
    •  
      CommentAuthornathan
    • CommentTimeOct 3rd 2005
     # 5
    I want them to move to Australia, so that Sydney can get free WiFi also.

    *sniff*
  1.  # 6
    google just gotta make sure they don't turn into a 'microsoft' type corporation.
  2.  # 7
    just imagine if google and microsoft merged. I'm 95% sure there are laws preventing it and it would be in neither companies interest.
    But imagine the possibilities.
    •  
      CommentAuthornathan
    • CommentTimeOct 4th 2005
     # 8
    *tries to imagine

    They would run the digital communications market.

    But I would say that google is MORE widespread than Microsoft. Google is used not only by Windows users, but almost everyone else connected to the net also, regardless of operating system.

    It would be crazy though. I also aggree that there are laws preventing either company merging to prevent a market manopoly (not that there already isn't)
    •  
      CommentAuthorKrak
    • CommentTimeOct 4th 2005 edited
     # 9
    It would be scary. If Google bought/merged with MS thats one thing. And if MS bought/merged with Google, thats another thing, and that would be the bad one.

    EDIT: lol, had to edit and use Markdown. Otherwise "bought/merged" popped out the Krak function.
    •  
      CommentAuthorlech
    • CommentTimeOct 4th 2005
     # 10
    if google bought ms, that would be one thing, if ms bought google, that would be fucking scary.
    •  
      CommentAuthornathan
    • CommentTimeOct 4th 2005
     # 11
    aggreed.

    I think Microsofts' day has come. They have really spent heaps of money on Vista, and I don't think it is going to be the hit they want it to be.

    I don't think MS is in a possition to take over Google. Not at this stage anyway.
    •  
      CommentAuthorKrak
    • CommentTimeOct 4th 2005
     # 12
    From what I hear, its gonna take a hefty video card just to run Vista (with its goodies) decently. But if your not going to use the "goodies", whats the point of Vista? I dont think Vista is gonna be a big hit either. Looks like its just a XP reload with a bunch of Eye Candy.
    •  
      CommentAuthornathan
    • CommentTimeOct 4th 2005
     # 13
    I think you need a 256meg viedeo card and like 2gig of ram as minimum to run vista.

    So stupid.
    •  
      CommentAuthornathan
    • CommentTimeOct 4th 2005
     # 14

    Google Inc. took a step toward challenging Microsoft Corp.'s dominance of computer software with the announcement Tuesday of a collaboration agreement with Sun Microsystems Inc.

    The move could lead to Google offering next-generation word processing, spreadsheet and collaboration tools that would take on Microsoft's industry-leading Office suite of software.

    But for now its significance may be mostly as a symbolic shot across Microsoft's bow, signaling Google's intention of attacking the world's biggest software company head on.

    Aside from a plan to offer Google's toolbar program with downloads of Java software, details of the agreement were scant. Though it could lead to a new pipeline for Sun software to millions of computers, there was no firm commitment.

    Some downplayed the announcement as a publicity stunt that probably would not have occurred had Google CEO Eric Schmidt not spent 14 years of his career working at Sun under CEO Scott McNealy.

    The alliance would be a boon for Sun if Google had promised to buy some of the company's sophisticated computers, but no ironclad commitments were announced.

    "There really isn't much depth to this partnership," said industry analyst Rob Enderle.

    "I think Eric is doing this as personal favor for Scott," he said. "It provides a certain amount of press and visibility to Sun when there hasn't been very many positive things going on at the company."

    Sun's shares edged up a penny Tuesday to close at $4.20 on the Nasdaq Stock Market, where Google's shares fell $7.68 to finish at $311. Microsoft's shares lost 52 cents, or 2.04 percent, to close at $24.98.

    As part of the agreement, Sun will offer Google's search toolbar with downloads of its free Java software, which is required to run a variety of Web-based applications and works with multiple operating systems.

    The two companies, which did not disclose terms of the deal, said they also agreed "to explore opportunities to promote" other Sun technologies, including the freely available OpenOffice.

    OpenOffice, an offshoot of Sun's StarOffice, is a leading challenger to the ubiquitous Office suite, a major cash cow for Microsoft. Both offer a word processor and spreadsheet among other applications.

    "OpenOffice is already an alternative, but if Google gets involved in supporting it, that could be the thing that puts it over the top," said Forrester Research analyst John R. Rymer.

    Neither McNealy nor Schmidt would say when or how Google might distribute Sun's software. Both said the Google toolbar option for Java downloads — the toolbar provides quick access to Google search, spell checking and a popup-ad blocker — is just a first step in a significant agreement.

    "We only want to talk about what we're talking about here now ... we expect more," McNealy said.

    Microsoft did not immediately comment.

    OpenOffice could provide a vehicle for Google to diversify its sales, which are driven almost exclusively by online advertising. So-called office productivity software generates more than $10 billion in annual sales, estimated Citigroup analyst Mark Mahaney.

    "We believe this creates a potentially interesting new revenue opportunity for Google," Mahaney wrote in a research note Tuesday.

    The deal could eventually boost the fortunes of programs that work on multiple operating systems, eating into Microsoft's profits from its dominant Windows computing environments.

    Increasingly, many of the applications that computer users value most — such as news and weather tickers — run as Web services independent of the operating systems on their computers.

    Java is a backbone of those Web services, along with Microsoft's .NET architecture.

    Since it was launched a decade ago, Java has been used to power Web-based applications, standalone programs, cell phones and other gadgets across a variety of computer operating systems.

    A key component of Sun's decade-old Java, its application-running platform, was the source of one of many rifts between Microsoft and Sun over the years.

    Sun first sued the world's top software maker in 1997, claiming the Redmond, Wash., company rewrote elements of Java specific to Windows. Later, Microsoft said it would yank Java entirely from its ubiquitous software.

    The wrangling ended in spring 2004, when the companies surprised the world with a $1.95 billion settlement and 10-year collaboration agreement.

    Both Sun and Google share the common root of Stanford University. Sun — short for Stanford University Network — was founded there in the 1980s, while Google got its start there in the 1990s. And one of Sun's co-founders, Andy Bechtolsheim, gave Google's Larry Page and Sergey Brin $100,000 in 1998 to incorporate their young search company.

    Sun has lost $4.5 billion since June 2001, although the Santa Clara, Calif.-based company has recently started to show signs of recovery.
    •  
      CommentAuthornathan
    • CommentTimeOct 4th 2005
     # 15

    While Sun has been struggling, Google's fortunes have steadily risen. Though best known as a search engine, it now offers free e-mail, maps, instant messaging, video and last week announced it wants to provide free Wi-Fi to San Francisco.


    This was posted on Yahoo news about 1 hour ago.
    Sorry I had to post it over two comments. Too much text.

    here is a link Yahoo news doesn't stick around long, so I posted the text.

    Looks good!
    •  
      CommentAuthorKosmo
    • CommentTimeOct 5th 2005
     # 16
    But basically it's world domination between Google and me, and world domination is hard work and I'm lazy, so I'm happy to give Google a shot at it, if they don't get it working I suppose that I have to rule the world with my iron grip.

    *drops juice box* DAMN MY GIRLISH GRIP!
    •  
      CommentAuthorlech
    • CommentTimeOct 5th 2005
     # 17
    Krak, from what I'm told now, MS might actually be putting back their new filing system into vista supposedly. But other than that, yeah, it's not much more than a reworked XP with a glassed over interface plastered into 3D with all the bells and whistles. While it does look nice, I don't see any gain by making me upgrade nearly my entire system (which is now only a year old) all over again. Frankly, I'd wish Apple would seriously open up OSX onto all current P4's and beyond, crush the need for windows dependance all together I say.

    I also don't see the significance of Google putting stock into Open Office. Unless of course the move is to bolster a better more supportive software suite, then hell, I'm all for it. It looks like some payback gesture for SUN investing 100k into googles durring their early years. Either way it might be promising. What's next? Google OS?
    •  
      CommentAuthorKosmo
    • CommentTimeOct 5th 2005
     # 18
    Well, it's not even a secret of anykind, that MS pushed IBMs OS/2 Warp from the market, so if somehow Google would get the big guns Sun, Apple and themselfs to the PC SO market and SHOVE IT to MS, I'd be on the front row giggling like a little girl with pigtails and cotton candy.
  3.  # 19
    lech - i cant tell from your post whether or not you're aware of the intentiones behind open office investments, but i do believe the plan is to turn it online and develop some kind of web accessible office suite. Thats what i got from the news reports anyway, not sure how it would work but it certainly sounds intreaguing.

    Google OS could be fun. Just imagine all those O's.
    •  
      CommentAuthorlech
    • CommentTimeOct 5th 2005
     # 20
    Mini, yeah, I've heard great reviews from friends and peers about OO, and have been tempted to give it a whirl myself. But there's nothing in my line of development that even requires ANY kind of office software so I haven't even gotten around to trying it out. It even looks less flakey than MS office without all the retarded XP-like interface changes. Not sure what they have in mind though for the web-accessible version, I just hope to god it's not written in java. Java makes baby jesus bawl.
    •  
      CommentAuthorKrak
    • CommentTimeOct 5th 2005
     # 21
    Its interesting and might be good for Google to get into all this, and maybe even an OS...I think a Google Browser is next.

    But I think once Google has dominated, and has control over half the shit we use, its gonna turn ugly.
    •  
      CommentAuthorKosmo
    • CommentTimeOct 6th 2005
     # 22
    lech, me thinks that OOo is already written in Java, either that or the code is written with a pair of mittens, since it works so slowwwww, sooooo slowwwww sloooooow!

    But I agree with you, if they make the online version and they make it with Java, they are only going to piss people.

    Krak, Google has been pretty big speaker on syndication, standards and other that kind of shit, so I'm not so sure that they'll make another half-assed browser, instead, I think that they are either going to buy one of the current ones OR start jointly working with one.
    •  
      CommentAuthorlech
    • CommentTimeOct 6th 2005
     # 23
    I don't think it's written in java at the moment, instead they're probably just using cross-platform libraries. Otherwise you would be required to install java and all that other crap with it. Which I wouldn't do since every single time I've installed sun java it's caused some type of infection on my system due to virus's sneaking out of the sandbox.
    • CommentAuthordknowles
    • CommentTimeOct 6th 2005
     # 24
    Why would google release a browser? Firefox is just fine. In fact, google quite likes firefox, I believe.

    As for the Google + OpenOffice thing...imagine having boundless internet storage for office documents. And online collaboration. I have no insider information on this one (not that I could tell you if I did...lousy NDA), but that would be my guess for that one.

    I don't see it as so much of a "killing microsoft" sort of thing as a lot of "journalists" will report it. I see it more as we want to make the coolest, best tools available for everyone.

    But I am by no means a spokesperson for the company. Just the humble opinion of little 'ol me.
    •  
      CommentAuthorlech
    • CommentTimeOct 7th 2005
     # 25
    Wow, it's quite amazing that google has finally ported out the google toolbar and hosted it themselves with all the features you find in the normal one. Kudo's to google for doing that finally, I missed it so. As for google pushing firefox, that's no suprise and has been known for quite some time even before it was public. There's a ton of smart people over at google doing the right things and pushing towards freedom in the right areas. I just hope they keep it up.
    •  
      CommentAuthorlech
    • CommentTimeOct 7th 2005
     # 26
    Ok, I take it back, it's the same old google toolbar by the previous developers which doesn't function entirely the same as the one in IE did. I can't get rid of some of these buttons or add any other customized buttons to that toolbar. What a waste of space :/
    •  
      CommentAuthorKrak
    • CommentTimeOct 7th 2005
     # 27
    I hate any add-on toolbars. The browser is good enough.
  4.  # 28
    •  
      CommentAuthorKrak
    • CommentTimeOct 7th 2005
     # 29
    Interesting.
  5.  # 30
    I thought this was their master plan (zoom for full world domination details)
    •  
      CommentAuthorlech
    • CommentTimeOct 7th 2005
     # 31
    whoa, what the deuce?
    •  
      CommentAuthorgiginger
    • CommentTimeOct 7th 2005
     # 32
    That's the new google feed reader :)
    •  
      CommentAuthorKrak
    • CommentTimeOct 7th 2005
     # 33
    Nice.
    •  
      CommentAuthorkaa
    • CommentTimeOct 8th 2005
     # 34
    Wow, a google feed reader now as well?

    I personally love google. I used to have a real thing against monopolies and companies that became absolutely massive, but I've taken a different stance on Google.

    I suppose it's because I genuinely find all of their services useful. Gmail is great because it does it so differently compared to other services (much like how vanilla works actually). Maps is fantastic and has actually helped me out loads of times (even down here in the UK). Images is particularly useful. And Video looks set to be just a bit of fun.

    Also, you're not really forced to use Google as you are forced to use, say Windows (yes, I know you can use any other operating system, but most offices have windows installed and there's not much you can do about that). If I wanted to, I could happily use the web without using any of google's services at all, you have a choice.

    That said, I do think that there is a bit too much fanboyism developing regarding google. Google talk is a good example of this, a lot of people praise it's simplicity but really, it's just a bit rubbish :P
    • CommentAuthordknowles
    • CommentTimeOct 8th 2005
     # 35
    Lech, you can add/remove any of the google toolbar buttons in firefox. Just go to customize... under the normal toolbars and you can add/remove everything just like the rest of the firefox buttons.

    And that google feedreader is neat. I saw that like a month ago. =)
    • CommentAuthordknowles
    • CommentTimeOct 8th 2005
     # 36
    kaa--google talk will get better. trust me. =)
    •  
      CommentAuthorgiginger
    • CommentTimeOct 8th 2005
     # 37
    I like google talk as it is. The lack of emoticons and other such rubbish is a major boon for me. The only way it could improve for me is if it allows me to log into MSN etc so I don't have to get my friends to change programs OR leave MSN installed.
    •  
      CommentAuthorlech
    • CommentTimeOct 9th 2005
     # 38
    david, yeah, you can remove some, but not all of them, the one i want to get rid of most is the little input/comb box but it's fixed in there. as well as not being able to add anything else (other extensions/buttons) into the same bar. That alone renders it kind of a space waster not worthy of my firefox :D I've got other extensions which do most of the jobs I need for it either way :D
Add your comments
    Username Password
  • Format comments as